The text follows arguing that the reflection of one forms ample has a notable philosophy degree. that, this form of knowledge is based on one high reflexiva activity. Therefore, wedge to understand philosophy corresponds to the act to learn to filosofar. Now, from this moment of the text the author makes an investigation: what it is philosophy? He discourses on the fact of that many professors of philosophy use the same one as content and not as method in the application of its lessons that is, filosofar is reduced the by-product condition, where its absence does not make the lesser difference in the value of what it has taught itself. Wedge follows speaking of importance of the understanding of this to make for the construction of the knowledge.
Learning to learn is the best form to learn to know. All this mental process if finds in the attitude of filosofar, local where the information processed and are elaborated in the objective to weave the knowledge in the intention of if deciding practical questions of the life. The analysis continues and the author says that in the case of the philosophical knowledge, the information are categories and concepts, substances with that if he allows the construction of principles to think itself inside of a theoretical picture or inside of a model of behavior. That is, it is the chance of if reflecting on the beddings of what we accept for true, valid, correct, certain, just. The act of filosofar for the author is a species of exercise of abilities in the manipulation of concepts, categories and principles; that is, it is the capacity that if has of to interpret and to judge the affirmations or negations concerning the truths established by means of the knowledge. Thus, it is that the philosophical analysis if constitutes in a critical one of as if is interpreting or judging the valid thought.