The reality of living in a country that coexists the hunger is horrenda. Still more, if the country will be as Brazil, a food granary. This happens, over all, because of the egoism of the detainers of most of the wealth of the country to if worrying only about the proper stomach. As bigger producer of some agricultural item and one of the five exporting greaters of foods, Brazil alone increases the incentives directed toward the external market, to the step that diminishes the production for the domestic market, thus aggravating the taxes of chronic hunger in the country, where about 32 million people they suffer with this reality. It is difficult to understand as in a country where the records of agricultural production are increasing in elapsing of the years, the hunger is part of the daily one of an alarming number of people.
The root of this problem is notable: pssima distribution of income in the country, a time that only 10% of the Brazilians hold back most of the wealth. To modify this situation means to modify the life of the society, what it can not to be desirable, since it would oppose the interests and privileges of the dominant groups. Cmodo is and safer not to make responsible the extreme natural population growth or intempries as causes of the hunger and the misery that haunt the great majority of the population contingent. We possess, beyond resources and technology, enough food for all e, therefore, we can yes, to win the hunger. Only that for this, a solidary spirit is necessary alimentary to defeat the virus of the egoism and to abdicate of the consumista dream, ilusoriamente inculcado for the propaganda and to implement a solidary globalization. This mainly because the existence of hungry is inadmissible in a region as abundance of foods. Who already witnessed the greed with that the street inhabitants devoram the food remaining portions, considered ' ' inadequate for consumo' ' for the great Brazilian restaurants, it could perceive that, as insaciveis animals, these people renounce the dignity human being in order to kill the hunger that kills to them. This if of without, many times, if give account of that its true assassins are of tender arguing ' ' interests of pas' '.
And we try to chat about his happiness, personal, small, individual Private If you have no home – he was not afraid of fires. Until you do this all the way home. And your wife will not go to another If you do not have wives You dream about the house until it does not exist. If there are no cars – you dream about the car. What we do not enough, that and crave.
While his wife has not gone in another, you can only dream about it!))) Joke. And imagine that the goal is reached! Hooray! Here it is! Wait! Policeman sitting in a guard booth, out of boredom fly presses. Suddenly hit him gold fly and prayed: – Do not push me, Cop mug! And I will fulfill your three wishes! The policeman and said: – I want on a desert island! Looks – just on the island – Secondly, I want to be women, vodka and fun. Looking – and this is celebrated! – And third, make it so I did not do anything, and the money received! Policeman sitting in the guard booth and out of boredom fly presses. To you came again, thinking that happiness is not enough? Well, let's add — up to 100kg per person.
Or more more? Not, perhaps, in kilograms, happiness is not to measure – whether it's even kilograms of gold. And what then? In degrees, liters, pieces or millimeters of mercury? And how it should be gomosapiensu? Pundits say that it should be in measure. A unit that measures fail: Cool, yeah? Someone thinks that the more the better.
Creating an image is moving the main force to implement and materialize ideas. Why image? Due to the primary energy of thought, and only then after the formation of appropriate conditions is it materialization. Example. After high school the young man in the minds of well-formed manner with regard to ways of making money, namely the acquisition of skills and their subsequent sale. Once having made choice of employment a person restricts their lives out a clear framework for which is not possible if the mind sometimes does not have thoughts on the incarnation of the ideas are not joined to programmed actions.
How should we understand this statement? In the minds of people formed the clear steps to be taken in order to get the planned result. Why, in his opinion, all done correctly and at the exit 'elephant turned suddenly'? The reason is that certain acts were formed based on outdated knowledge and life during this time has made a new round, then the person behind it is absolutely not interested. Information was taken before the emergency, failed to take advantage of your problems. Agree, in each of our lives circumstances arise that require quick response and right decision. 90% of people do not use these possibilities. Fear is living in people's souls will not let fly, because he will lose the ward, and then draw energy from. Led by the fear of everyone is waiting for more favorable confluence of circumstances, that certainly turned out to all 200%.