The liberal vision nailed that the free auto-regulation was the only form to keep the flour always in offers in the market since only the most supplied they would consume, this would prevent a possible exhaustion of the production, giving to the intemedirio a necessary paper. For Thompson, as much paternalism how much liberalism is utopian. ' ' multido' ' it assumed a bond in general as paternalism being, thus, in common agreement with the nobility against new the practical ones of the bourgeoisie to profit on the wheat. The traders, had as the profiteers, exporters of wheat and intermediary broke ethical peasant of access guaranteed to the quality wheat. Thus, the fairs (local where the consumers had access to the direct wheat of the producer and, therefore, more cheap) enter in crisis and occur asceno of the millers who adulterated the wheat and practised what Thompson calls banalit of the XVIII.Ocorre century then the public interest action in the regulation of the price of the bread. The rebellion assumed form of cultural representation, aiming at the applicability of the paternalistas laws of the effective order. The threat of rebellions kept the prices in regularity therefore the order was necessary to the survival of the bourgeois classroom and the governing nobility.

The lesser profitability was preferable the rebellion. In this, the producers yielded and took the cereals to the market in detriment of the sales, more lucrative, to the intermediate. The popular rebellions were sfregas in short term in sight of the distrust of the wheat producers, but in the near future they were victorious when keeping the price of the wheat next to the moral price of what of the lucrative price. To leave of 1795 up to 1801 a balance in addition occurs between the nobility and the plebeians in the maintenance of more traditional economic values. The jacobinismo of the plebeians if shocked with the new ideology of the economy politics associated with the profit and the private property.